Alienation, autonomy, and ideology

Category: Iowa (Page 1 of 15)

Can Local Government Lead Us?

In 2025, we uncovered reasons for optimism about the potential for local government to drive leftist political change. Zohran Mamdani’s election in NYC, in particular, brought together a promising electoral coalition: leftists, young people, working class people across racial lines, the economically and politically disaffected, and progressives of all racial groups.

We even saw a local version in Iowa City. Electorally, Oliver Weilein won a city council special election, becoming likely the furthest left candidate ever elected to city office anywhere in the state of Iowa. But it’s not just about Weilein’s election. We also see potential in moves toward social democracy in our policy discussions. From fare free transit to permanent supportive housing, public debate shifted to approaches friendlier to leftist goals.

It did so against the backdrop of far right advance at the state and federal levels.

These are good things. But there’s a tension in that, or so I’ll argue. I want to balance the good with a note of caution. The shifts in local government remain partial, incomplete, and subject to sharp limits. While affirming the optimism many of us rightly feel, I’ll say a word in this post about those limits.

Continue reading

An Activist Legacy?

When I turned 40, I wrote a post contemplating retirement from activism and activist work. More than anything else, I identified 40 as a crossroads. It’s a point where a person should step back and reconsider what they’re doing, especially in a college town with so many people in their 20s.

Nearing my 43rd birthday, I’m ready to check back in on the topic. I’ve definitely changed how I do activist work in the past few years. But even more so, I’ve thought about the legacy I might want to leave.

Let’s talk legacy.

Continue reading

Why the ‘Left’ Lost the City Council Election

So, we held another city council election in Iowa City. As usual, we can pull a few lessons from the results.

But first, let’s talk about the big picture. Three incumbents ran for office – Megan Alter and Bruce Teague in the At-Large race and Shawn Harmsen in District B – and they all won. Who’d they defeat? Newman Abuissa and Clara Reynen in the former race and Amy Hospodarsky in the latter.

At first glance, it feels mundane. The voters gave a new term to three popular incumbents. Big deal.

But to many Iowa Citians, the race held interest for its impact on the factions the six supposedly represent. Progressive and activist circles took this as a loss, with most backing Abuissa, Hospodarsky, and Reynen. And those who oppose them chalked it up as a win, because they backed Alter, Harmsen, and Teague. Even though more than a few of them would’ve opposed Alter, Harmsen, and Teague in the not so distant past.

As it goes.

However, I find this all very misguided. I’ll say a word about why the three challengers lost. But in the process of getting there, I’ll need to deal with all this folderol about ‘factions.’

Continue reading

A Better One Question Political Test

In a recent post on local politics, I said it’s a bad idea to reduce local politics to things under the ‘abolition’ label. More generally, it’s a bad idea to reduce politics to any single issue.

People often look for shortcuts. I get that. But if you’re going to do so, find a better shortcut.

Our local DSA chapter used a long questionnaire for 2025 city council endorsements. Some of the questions are redundant, and many don’t apply to local elections. But sometimes this happens in a democratic org. Anyway, one question reads as follows: “What do you believe is the root cause of the housing crisis, and how would you seek to address it in office?”

That’s a great question, and it makes for a better single issue test. Why? For one, housing stands out as the most important issue in Iowa City politics. People who earn average incomes can’t afford a place to live. Many are getting pushed out to Coralville, North Liberty, or beyond. But also, it’s an issue on which many people hold key misconceptions. YIMBY and NIMBY politics dominate our area, even among progressives and those who believe they’re ‘leftists.’

Having read the answers given by three candidates, here’s a handy guide to interpreting responses:

Candidate cites capitalism, finance capital, financialized capitalism, private equity, and/or neoliberalism: Correct Answer

Candidate cites housing supply: YIMBY

Candidate cites housing demand among individual buyers: NIMBY

Even though the three candidates we quizzed – Newman Abuissa, Amy Hospodarsky, Clara Reynen – slot into the same alleged ‘faction’ of local politics, only one came up with the correct response.

That candidate was Clara Reynen. The other two tested out as YIMBYs.

If you’re looking for a simple test, it’s this one. And Clara Reynen passed the test.

The Local Politics of Small Differences

We’re in the middle of a city council election cycle in Iowa City. Plenty of people are getting worked up about it.

In some ways that’s a good thing.

It means we live in a politically engaged city. And there are lots of issues for us to tackle. On top of this, the previous election – a special election between Ross Nusser and Oliver Weilein – offered deep, meaningful differences on how to run a city in a revanchist era. Its results emerged from a realignment of our local politics.

But this election strikes me in a different way.

At least four (and possibly five or six) of the six candidates aren’t very different from one another. They practice broadly similar politics. However, people think they’re different. This calls for a closer examination of the forces that push people to over-invest in local electoral politics.

Let’s do that.

Continue reading

« Older posts