Iowa City redesigned its pedestrian mall a few years ago. Since the ped mall serves as our agora, that’s no minor task. Among other things, the city planned to replace older, open park benches with new ones. Several groups – most notably the Iowa City Catholic Worker House – claimed the new benches prevented people in a state of homelessness from sleeping on them. They called it ‘hostile architecture.’ Why? The new benches had middle armrests. As it turned out, city council meeting transcripts confirmed city officials already knew this.
And then folks with the Worker House made unreasonable demands. They demanded the city replace all the new benches. And they held a ‘sleep in‘ to draw public attention to the issue and to city officials taking an opposing stance. Why is the demand unreasonable? The city reported it would cost about $150,000, money that probably would’ve come from more important social services.
Ultimately, they reached a deal. Iowa City replaced 14 of the new benches at a lower cost. And it did so without taking money from social services.
Therefore, making unreasonable demands is a strategy that works, right? Well, maybe. Let’s find out.
Continue reading