Thoughts on production, alienation, and ideology

Category: Gender (Page 1 of 6)

Re-Assessing Trump’s Base

After Trump won the 2016 election, the mainstream media – and even many leftists! – promoted a certain falsehood. They claimed Trump won on the strength of a working-class voter base.

The reality was much different.

In fact, Trump’s base looked similar to the typical GOP base. It differed only in degree. Trump won on the strength of voters who combined a high income with a low education. Most of these voters were a part of what Marxists call the ‘petty bourgeois’ class, and many of them were just regular wealthy people. I covered this more extensively in a 2018 post and a later Medium article.

The ‘one weird trick’ Trump pulled led to all the confusion. It’s a specific rhetorical trick. In short, Trump speaks about one audience, but to another. He often expresses the hopes and fears of working-class people, but he targets wealthier voters with the message. The press conflates the subject audience with the target audience. Readers can review that argument here.

But we’re not here to talk about 2016 or 2020. Trump won again in 2024, and the mainstream media – and even many leftists! – make the same claim.

So, how about this time? Surely Trump attracted a working-class target base in 2024, right?

Continue reading

Lux Magazine

As I mentioned in an earlier post on culture and politics, I recently started subscribing to Lux Magazine.

Why?

The decline of Bitch magazine presented an opening in the socialist feminist reading space. It quit publishing things that interested me, and then it quit publishing altogether. But I wanted to read insightful discussion of feminism and pop culture from a socialist perspective.

Lux entered that space! And so far, I think it has done a reasonable job at it. An issue I received in January 2024, for example, discusses Palestinian activism, tenant union battles against landlords, and book reviews of both new books and classics. I learned a fair bit.

That said, the mag isn’t perfect. Its politics often lean toward ultra-progressivism, especially in its advocacy for ‘abolition.’ It also publishes some of the more frivolous takes on pop culture that pervade the feminist pop culture lit.

But, on the whole, it’s an interesting and informative magazine. Readers should give it a look!

Image Source

Social Reproduction Theory

In the recent edited collection Social Reproduction Theory, Tithi Bhattacharya and others make timely contributions to Marxist feminism.

Their main message is that rather than commodities, labor plays a central role in both production and the social reproduction of society. Contrary to dual-system theory, Bhattacharya and others see social reproduction theory as offering a unitary account of production and reproduction. Unlike many early Marxists, however, they center labor and class conflict in explaining both.

I’ll take a closer look at Bhattacharya’s introduction to the volume, as well as her essay in the collection. I think her work, in particular, best captures the spirit of the approach.

Continue reading

Two Deeper Problems for the Implicit Association Test

Anyone following the replication crisis (and other debates) in the social sciences knows about one key problem with the implicit association test. In short, it’s not clear whether the test predicts anything. That is to say, ‘implicit bias,’ as measured by the IAT, might not predict prejudice or discriminatory behavior.

That’s a problem for the IAT for the obvious reason that its creators intend it as a major tool in the fight against racism, sexism, and other forms of oppression.

But I want to suggest that the IAT has even deeper problems. At least two of them. Even if the IAT does predict behavior, it still doesn’t explain a lot about why racism and sexism and happen. Nor does it tells us how to fight them.

Continue reading

« Older posts