Alienation, autonomy, and ideology

Category: Voting (Page 5 of 5)

These are posts on voting from the blog Base and Superstructure. These posts concern issues about who to vote for, particularly from a left-wing perspective.

Bernie 2020 and The Left

bernie 2020

Source: Democracy Chronicles (https://www.flickr.com/photos/democracychronicles/42715589844)

Jacobin and Current Affairs are in war mode. Their enemy? The centrist wing of the Democratic Party. Their lone, brave soldier? Bernie Sanders. It’s all hands on deck for Bernie 2.0.

At times, they insist that Bernie run in 2020. At other times, it’ s more nuanced. Nathan J. Robinson, in particular, presents Bernie less as the shining knight of Jacobin and more as the best progressive option who also, by the way, happens to have the best chance of defeating Trump.

With Elizabeth Warren officially in the presidential race, it’s all the more pressing an issue.

As leftists, what should we make of all this? Is Sanders the only choice? If so, does that mean we all have to jump on board?

Continue reading

Harm Reduction by Voting Democratic?

The Democratic Party has had a tough time keeping the left in line. Lately it’s engaging in endless hand-wringing over alleged “Bernie-or-bust” Democrats, even though more Clinton primary voters supported John McCain in 2008 than Sanders primary voters supported Trump in 2016. More recently, Democrats frame their arguments to the left in terms of harm reduction.

Is ‘harm reduction’ a new argument? Or is it just a warmed over version of the ‘lesser evil’ argument? Is it a good argument? As a result of these considerations, should we vote based on harm reduction?

I’ll address these questions below.

Continue reading

Pragmatic Approaches to Voting

pragmatic Keep Calm and Vote

Source: James Mallos (https://www.flickr.com/photos/james_mallos/15467214887)

Leftists and liberals love arguing about how to vote, whether they admit it or not. Pragmatic issues are central to these debates. They enter through the front or rear door, but they’re there.

Even the most hardcore anti-electoralists talk about electoral issues. Anarchists like Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Peter Kropotkin, and the Catalonian anarchists drew lines. Sometimes they crossed those lines.

I’ve given the issue some thought over the years. I’ll lay out these thoughts in this post.

Here’s how I vote. How do you vote?

Continue reading

How to Change the World

Everyone’s new to political activism at some point. We probably know we’re not going to change the world in a day. No one was born with a bullhorn in hand and a cowering group of bourgeoisie 5 feet in front of them. To change the world takes time, comrades, and effort.

But sometimes movements come along and sweep up far more newbies than usual.

The 2016 presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders is one of those movements. It was neither the first nor even the most recent. It’s not even the only one with current impact (see, e.g., Black Lives Matter, pro-immigrant movements gaining steam since 2016, etc.). But it’s one that included many, many, first-time activists.

You can find Sandersistas doing many things now. They’re joining the Democratic Socialists of America and running for Congress. They’re working on immigration or housing or employment justice. These Sandersista newbies tend to be: 18-30 years old, either in college and afraid of student debt and part-time, dead-end work, or currently engaged in part-time, dead-end work that they’d like to escape. They’re a racially diverse coalition. Economically, they’re largely from middle and upper-middle class backgrounds, but precariously so. Consequently, they’re worried that they could backslide.

They’re correct to worry.

I’ve been engaged in activist-y type activity (‘change the world’ type stuff, broadly construed) since sometime in the late 90s or so. Consequently, I feel I’ve picked up a few things along the way. These are a few lessons I’ve learned in that time that maybe the Sandersistas will find useful:

Continue reading

Newer posts »