Base and Superstructure

Thoughts on production, alienation, and ideology

Page 110 of 110

Identity Politics and Identitarianism

identitarianism

Identity politics, in various forms, have become perhaps the political ideology of our time and place. I suspect this is true in many places. But I limit my scope in this post to recent politics in the United States. People sometimes toss around the related term ‘identitarianism.’

The trouble is that we don’t really know what ‘identity politics’ means. Or, perhaps worse, we all know what it means. It’s just that no one agrees on what it is they all know.

I’m going to define ‘identity politics’ and ‘identitarianism’ in this post. I don’t claim that my definitions are the right ones, or that everyone else’s are wrong. I’m just laying out how I’ll be using those terms in this blog. Hopefully you’ll find this both explanatory and helpful when looking at real problems and issues.

Continue reading

Base and Superstructure

base and superstructure

‘Base and Superstructure’ is the title of this blog. And so you might think it’s central to my approach to politics.

That’s true, as far as it goes. But it turns out it impacts things in a variety of ways.

‘Base’ and ‘superstructure’ are complementary terms from Marxist theory. They are the two sides of a division of society. The base includes human labor power and its tools, machines, etc. It also includes people’s relations in economic production. Think about, for example, employers and employees, coworkers, etc. The superstructure includes most of the rest of visible society: culture, religion, ideology, values, beliefs, social institutions, personal and group identities, etc.

Continue reading

Newer posts »