Base and Superstructure

Alienation, autonomy, and ideology

Page 2 of 116

Coda: People-Powered Planning

This week’s post is a follow up to last week’s post. We might call it a coda.

I recently read an article on housing and zoning in Current Affairs. It’s called In Sprawl We Trust, and it’s written by the consistently compelling Allison Lirish Dean.

Indeed, about a year ago, I wrote about her take on ‘strong towns.’ There we discovered the limits of the term.

In this article, Dean provides us with a different frame for thinking about debates over zoning. Housing, of course, is one major focal point of those debates. Rather than thinking about the debate as split between a NIMBY and YIMBY side, she frames the debate as one between private capital and people-powered planning.

We can surely see the appeal.

Both NIMBY and YIMBY sides reject popular power. But Dean calls these sides ‘market suburbanists’ and ‘market urbanists.’ This phrasing places the two sides within broader zoning debates. They share a trust in the free market to deliver the goods, differing only in terms of how they want to use market power to protect private interests.

This contextualization helps. Indeed, it takes us all the way back to the idea of tenants unions. After all, what better way to prepare people for democratic decision making?

The NIMBY vs. YIMBY False Dichotomy

Housing is a top issue in Iowa City politics.

It’s not difficult to see why. We’re a growing college town of about 75,000 people. And while social and economic change have hit many parts of rural Iowa hard, we’ve weathered the storms relatively well. Iowa City faces more problems of gentrification than universal despair.

However, the prosperity of Iowa City pushes out many long-term and/or working-class residents. For one, the rent is too damn high. In addition, rising property values push less wealthy homeowners to foreclosure and prevent tenants from buying their first homes. Many move to Coralville or North Liberty. And as even those places see the same problems, some move further out to Hills, Tiffin, or Oxford.

Back in Iowa City, our housing debates degenerate into a false dichotomy between NIMBY and YIMBY views. Neither view serves the interests of working people and tenants.

And so, getting past the NIMBY vs. YIMBY false dichotomy is essential to understanding housing from a leftist perspective that’s centered on workers and tenants.

Continue reading

February Reading List (2025)

Hello everyone, and welcome to the second reading list of 2025! Deep in the Iowa winter, I’m staying warm with some books. And I hope you are, too.

I wrote last month about philosophical counseling, and I’m doing a bit of themed reading around that. Beyond this, I’ve found some interesting politics and fiction.

How about you?

Continue reading

Voter Hypocrisy and Iowa City Politics

For this post, I’m going super local. If you don’t live in Iowa City, you’ll find the local context unfamiliar. But the themes probably feel common enough for you to draw connections to your own community.

With that as a disclaimer, let’s get down to it.

County Supervisor Rod Sullivan blogged twice about our upcoming city council race. His first attempt was ill-informed. Readers who use my two part test for criticizing a candidate’s social media posts would have to conclude that it fails at least the second part.

But that’s the last time I’ll mention his first attempt. That’s not why I’m writing. I’m writing because Rod made a much more interesting and compelling second attempt to write about the race. That’s the post I’m using as a springboard here.

Like many others in Iowa City these days, Rod raised issues about what disqualifies a candidate from office. The topic has come up with regard to three candidates for office in the last year: Royceann Porter, Guillermo Morales, and Oliver Weilein.

I’ll introduce Rod’s argument, say a bit about why it’s such an appealing argument, and then I’ll lay out some of the problems in it. At the end of the day, there are huge differences between Weilein, on one hand, and Porter and Morales, on the other.

Continue reading

When is it OK to Criticize a Candidate for their Social Media Posts?

City council elections in Iowa City bring out personal attacks. Sadly, it always happens, and it usually happens to everyone on the ballot.

Notably, the attacks take different forms, depending on the ideology of the candidate. Attacks against candidates further to the left are the most common. But they’re also the most likely to come wrapped in various pieties about ‘Iowa Nice’ or ‘civility.’ They often involve tsk-tsking someone for social media posts.

That takes us to our latest installment. Both candidates in our upcoming election face criticism for their social media posts. But only one candidate faces attacks couched in the language of ‘civility.’ Attacks against the other candidate have focused on policy (though those are often overdone, and at times confirm Godwin’s Law).

So, what happened?

A variety of right-leaning Democrats – including a duo of an unpopular former mayor and a feckless state legislator, among others – launched a vicious, manipulative campaign against a left leaning city council candidate over his social media accounts. And after the candidate in question trounced their preferred candidate in a primary, some of them re-upped the attacks with all the urgency of desperate upper middle class hand-wringing.

With this incident in mind, I’d like to ask the question of when this sort of thing is OK. When can we attack a candidate for their social media posts?

Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »